What Is Carbon Accounting?
Carbon accounting is the process of calculating, analyzing, measuring, and reporting an organization's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions so that it is fully auditable. It’s sometimes called greenhouse gas accounting, carbon auditing, a carbon inventory, or greenhouse gas inventory. Organizations, businesses, cities, and many other entities use carbon accounting to manage their carbon footprint.
Carbon accounting quantifies the amount of GHGs produced by private and public organizations to better understand how much carbon they are emitting. It also measures which part of their operations is responsible for those emissions.
This information is essential for organizations to disclose their climate impact, communicate their broader environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) strategy, and facilitate informed decision-making as the world races to net-zero.
Today, organizations and reporters have many guidelines to explain what to measure, what data to collect, and how they can measure their carbon footprint. There are also many tools and solutions available to streamline the process and make the data accessible and usable.
Climate impact disclosure isn’t only for big corporations. To truly reach net-zero, every organization must measure its carbon footprint to make a global impact. In this guide, we’re going over everything you need to know about carbon accounting and why it’s important to start now.
What Do Organizations Need to Measure?
Organizations need to measure their scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions to understand their impact. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHGP) established these scopes to streamline how we categorize and measure emissions.
Scope 1 covers direct emissions created on-site from an organization's operations, like heating on-site for the office buildings.
Scope 2 covers indirect emissions from purchased energy, like the emissions created to power the office heater.
Scope 3 covers all other indirect emissions that exist in a company's value chain, like emissions generated from employee commutes.
Many governing entities require scope 1 and 2 reporting, while scope 3 is typically voluntary.
Scopes 1 and 2 are more easily mitigated with changes like switching to an electric vehicle fleet or purchasing renewable energies. These scopes can offer a straightforward way to begin your carbon accounting journey.
Scope 3, on the other hand, is notoriously difficult to calculate and mitigate. Emissions on the value chain can come from any entity, ranging from your suppliers to your customers. However, this complexity creates opportunities to engage with others to find ways to reduce your collective carbon footprint.
Several major companies have made public strides to reduce emissions while also recognizing the severity of scope 3 emissions. For example, PepsiCo committed to achieving net-zero. They also said that their scope 3 emissions accounted for 78% of their global GHG emissions in 2020.
When looking at other companies, the Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU) found that only 11% of companies in the Forbes Global 2000 list have achieved their net-zero targets so far.
Reporting Avoided Emissions
Avoided emissions are reductions that happen outside of the supply chain but still happen because of your product or service. Fuel-efficient tires are one example — there’s no requirement to measure or report on the emissions saved by using fuel-efficient tires compared to regular tires. The GHGP does provide guidance for estimating and reporting avoided emissions for organizations that are interested.
Who Requires Carbon Accounting?
Carbon accounting and reporting are primarily required by an area’s government and other governing entities. Requirements can vary, but most require reports of scope 1 and 2 emissions, with some encouraging (but not requiring) scope 3 emissions.
For example, the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) in the U.S. requires GHG data from CO2 injection sites, fuel and industrial gas suppliers, and other big emissions sources. In the U.K., they require large businesses to report their energy and carbon emissions under the Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR).
On a broader scale, the EU also requires all EU countries to report on their GHG emissions along with their climate policies, measures, and progress toward their goals.
What Are the Standards, Initiatives, and Organizations That Reporters Need To Know?
Reporters should get familiar with organizations and initiatives that provide direct guidance on reporting, like the GHGP, and broader ones that have influenced many areas and industries, like the Paris Climate Agreement.
There are many to understand and some that are more relevant to your organization than others. Your organization may also have local guidelines that you need to follow in addition to best practices set by larger ones. We’ll cover some of the most important standards, initiatives, and organizations below.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) created the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 1988. Their goal is to provide scientific information to all levels of government to create climate policies.
Although they don’t directly set standards for carbon accounting or anything similar, their projections and assessments may influence policy change that requires carbon accounting. They set up the Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (TFI) to manage the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme (NGGIP).
Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHGP)
The most recognized and utilized standard is the GHGP. Created in 1997 off the back of the Kyoto Protocol, the GHGP is the first international treaty for GHG reductions. This is a joint effort between the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD).
It provides guidelines and standards for organizations to develop inventories for GHG emissions. It’s designed to simplify data collection, improve consistency and provide organizations with the tools to report and manage their emissions. For example, the Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard helps organizations evaluate emissions along their value chain.
E-liability Accounting System
Robert S. Kaplan, Ph.D., and Karthik Ramanna, Ph.D. introduced the E-liability accounting system to address how the GHGP allows estimates for upstream and downstream emissions. They recommend phasing out the use of industry average data to allow organizations and regulators to adopt the E-liability system.
Guidance Built on GHG Protocol
Many industries require unique guidance that goes beyond the GHGP. Several organizations have worked with the GHGP to create those needed instructions. Below are resources that have earned the “Built on GHG Protocol” mark.
Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP)
Founded in 2000, the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) is a not-for-profit charity that supports companies, cities and other entities with measuring and managing their environmental impact through their global environmental disclosure system.
This is how CDP works:
Customers or investors request companies to disclose through CDP
Companies collect information and submit it to CDP
Companies use data to identify areas of improvement
CDP sends data and findings to investors and customers
CDP also uses the data in reports, analysis and company scoring
Submitting to CDP also makes it easier to compare your organization or entity to peers. Their findings and data can uncover opportunities you may have missed. Their scores also show how you measure up against peers.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) started in 1946 to create international standards. In 2006, they established standards for GHG management.
The ISO standards are meant to be complementary to the GHGP. For example, the GHGP goes over best practices for GHG inventories, while ISO 14064-1 gives minimum standards to comply with those best practices. ISO 14064-3 established standards for verifying an organization’s GHG reports.
In 2007, the ISO, WRI, and WBCSD signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) agreeing to promote both the ISO 14064 and GHGP standards. The ISO also has additional related standards relevant to reporting organizations:
Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi)
CDP, WRI, World Wildlife Foundation (WWF), and the UN Global Compact launched the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) in 2015. SBTi does many things to help organizations set science-based emission targets.
For example, they define best practices to reduce emissions, provide technical assistance and expert resources to companies, and help companies with independent assessments. Many standards require organizations to set science-based targets (SBTs).
The Paris Climate Agreement
The 2015 Paris Climate Agreement was a significant catalyst in furthering carbon accounting regulations, policies, and reporting standards to align with financial regulations. As a result, many countries began looking for ways to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.
Task Force for Climate-Related Disclosures (TCFD)
In 2017, the Task Force for Climate-Related Disclosures (TCFD) released a report, which set out a clear and consistent structure for climate-related disclosures. The report included proposals designed to apply to all organizations in all jurisdictions and give reliable, comparable, and forward-looking information for investors to base decisions.
Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF)
The Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF) became a global initiative in 2019. PCAF’s goal is to support financial institutions with a standardized methodology for measuring and reporting investing- and lending-related GHG emissions. These emissions fall under scope 3, category 15, and are often called financed emissions.
PCAF created the Global GHG Accounting and Reporting Standard for the Financial Industry to assess risks in line with the TCFD, set science-based targets that align with the SBTi, and report to stakeholders like the CDP. This standard has also earned the “Built on GHG Protocol” mark.
How Can Reporters Ensure They’re Gathering Effective Data?
Reporters should take into account how often data is collected and how transparent their data is to both internal and external stakeholders. Information should be accurate and usable to inform decision-making.
Those decisions can range from investors who are reviewing your company’s risk profile to a board member reviewing the progress your company is making toward its net-zero goals.
Below are a few characteristics your carbon accounting data should have to be effective:
Periodically collected so stakeholders can review the information and analyze progress in real-time
Easy to collect as the business grows since some data collection methods may not scale well with larger operations
Efficient to collect to allow for timely decision-making
Aligns with established standards and includes all required data
Comprehensively covers all carbon emissions, including scope 3
Identifies emissions sources to help prioritize reductions with the biggest impact
Straightforward presentation so any party can review for accuracy, compliance, and overall visibility
Reporters also need to consider their data’s accessibility. Accurate information is the first piece of the puzzle. Once the data is gathered, organizations need to keep it organized and up to date for a number of potential reasons, like requests from investors, updates for director reports, and decision-making to keep up with decarbonization targets.
What Are Common Issues Reporters Run Into With Carbon Accounting?
Reporters can have issues with understanding regulations, gathering data, and managing all the information and requests needed to report on this data.
Climate accounting is an evolving field with vast amounts of data points. And the world is rapidly developing new standards, policies, and regulations to ensure organizations remain accountable.
However, the calculations needed are highly complex, demanding thousands of data points from a company's operations. Traditional calculation methods are time-consuming and resource-intensive.
In Boston Consulting Group’s recent Carbon Measurement Report, they found that 76% of respondents are unable to measure the full carbon footprint of their products and services.
As a result of these complexities, much of today's carbon accounting is inaccurate and often months to years old, and in various (even proprietary) frameworks, leaving a lot of room for "creative accounting.” Thankfully, as regulation and investor demands increase, regulatory frameworks are beginning to unify and standardize this process.
Below are some common issues organizations run into when diving into carbon accounting:
Organizations have confusion surrounding regulations since many standards exist for different geographical areas and industries. Many governments and private entities are still creating new standards and regulations to find ways to improve the carbon accounting process.
Organizations can run into double-counting since some emissions may count for multiple categories. The GHGP alone also isn’t set up to compare two organizations to each other.
There may be differences in data quality among organizations since data and calculation methods can vary. Benchmarking and comparison can get difficult without completely standardized datasets.
It’s likely to find poor data quality within some organizations since some information is difficult to accurately collect.
Reporters may have difficulty with complex data sources since some data requires cooperation with other organizations and with consumers. Scope 3 emissions can be especially tough if organizations along your value chain don’t accurately measure their emissions.
Some organizations may have incomplete data since some information collected may not accurately reflect the amount of generated emissions or emissions sources.
Reporters may be unclear next steps to reduce emissions since it’s not always clear what does and doesn’t create a negative emissions impact.
There aren’t many comprehensive data management tools to store and analyze the data.
On a broader scale, there is also a lack of accountability for accuracy. Since there are many standards and different regulatory bodies, there aren’t any standard consequences for inaccurate reporting. This system can also contribute to a lack of high-quality data from reporting organizations.
How Can Organizations Assess the Data They Collect for Carbon Accounting?
Organizations can assess their data by using a Climate Management and Accounting Platform (CMAP) and other reputable tools.
CMAPs are software that simplifies the carbon accounting process, so calculations are done in days rather than months.
These platforms use codified guidelines like the GHGP and PCAF to calculate carbon emissions. This software can then:
Deliver real-time solutions based on organizational data
Gauge emissions reduction progress over time
Accurately track progress toward net-zero commitments using the latest data
Make reporting easy and accessible for stakeholders
Historically, carbon accounting information lived in complicated spreadsheets, contained outdated data, and was managed by expensive consultants.
The calculations are often so complex that it’s unrealistic to expect all companies to have the time, resources, or expertise to perform an accurate account of their emissions. Like financial accounting, effective tools must be developed to demystify the process and make it accessible to companies regardless of their size and resources.
In addition to CMAPs, organizations can look to official tools Built on GHG Protocol to know they’re getting accurate information.
What Are the Different Types of Carbon Accounting?
Physical carbon accounting and financial carbon accounting are two broad ways you can look at your data. Both methods are necessary to measure your environmental and financial impact.
Physical carbon accounting measures physical quantities, like the volume of emissions generated in your value chain.
Financial carbon accounting measures financial values, like the cost of generating emissions in your value chain.
Why Do Organizations Need To Invest in Carbon Accounting?
Stakeholder pressure, government regulations, and cost savings are all factors that compel organizations to decarbonize.
There has never been a more critical time for accurate carbon accounting. The reality of the financial implications of a global temperature rise over 2°C is setting in, and increasingly stringent governmental regulations have begun to hit home with businesses, investors, and stakeholders. One report found that 83% of consumers think it’s important for brands to focus on operating sustainably.
Here are a few reasons why organizations should invest in carbon accounting now:
Reduce your organization's impact on the environment and contribute to the global effort to reach net-zero emissions.
Set benchmarks and targets for reduction with your data.
Use data to inform carbon credit and carbon offset purchases.
Make informed decarbonization decisions and track progress with real-time data.
Identify high areas of emissions in your organization and value chain to see where reduction can make the biggest impact.
Get ahead of future regulations that may occur in your area or your industry.
Improve your organization’s operations and save on operational costs.
Justify the time, effort, and resources needed to reduce emissions by calculating the monetary cost of generating emissions.
Have information ready for climate risk reports requested from your board of directors, current investors, future investors, and other stakeholders.
Gather required information for business and government contract bids and grant applications.
Earn and establish trust with current and future customers and employees with transparent climate risk data.
Contribute your organization’s information to large bodies of research to combat climate change.
Carbon accounting is no easy feat given the amount of data needed and the regulations to learn. Persefoni’s CMAP can help your company organize your data in preparation for upcoming regulations and requests.
Request a demo today to see how we can streamline data collection and simplify climate disclosure, carbon accounting, and carbon management.