February 11, 2022 - ESG and Climate News

A weekly curated list of articles - written by me and others - to help keep up with this very dynamic space
Tim Mohin
By Tim Mohin
February 11, 20225 min read
January 31, 2023 at 4:31 PMUpdated
February 11, 2022Updated: January 31, 2023 at 4:31 PM5 min read

Quoting Spiderman: “With great power comes great responsibility.” 

This week's ESG and Climate news highlights the responsibility that powerful companies have towards their stakeholders - all of us! We also cover how governments are struggling to hold the powerful accountable for behaviors beyond their own financial self-interest. 

With great power comes great responsibility

A new report analyzed 25 companies accounting for 5% of global carbon emissions. Sadly, if predictably, the study found that most of the 25 companies are falling short of their own targets. Although all 25 claim some form of ‘net zero’ target, only 3 – Maersk, Vodafone, and Deutsche Telekom – are on track to decarbonize 90% or more of their emissions. 

Another promising sign came when BlackRock sent a letter to clients offering to help them with their transition to net zero. In addition to being the world’s largest asset manager with $10T under management, BlackRock aims to be “the world’s leading advisor and expert on investing in the net zero transition” committed to providing the “most sophisticated [and] up-to-date analytics of how the transition will unfold.

Who will hold the powerful accountable?

The mission of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) - and all stock market regulators - is to protect the investor. For years now, investors of all types have been asking for better ESG data - especially climate related disclosures. Investors need this information because it provides insights into hidden risks and can unlock new opportunities that materially affect their investments. Investor demands were backed up by the non-partisan Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) last October, when they identified climate change as a threat to financial stability.

Sadly, even with mountains of evidence supporting the need, the SEC seems to have hit a snag in developing their much anticipated climate disclosure rule. It’s certain that the new rule will be litigated - almost a year ago the attorney general of the coal-state of West Virginia vowed to litigate even before the new rule is proposed. Chastened by the threat, the Commissioners are trying to design a regulation that will stand up to the inevitable litigation. 

Reportedly, SEC Chair Gensler will delay until the most legally defensible climate proposal can be created. The issue causing all the hand-ringing is the extent of “scope 3” emissions that should be disclosed. These are the carbon emissions that are outside of a companies direct control and thus can be difficult to report and manage. However, for most companies, scope 3 emissions are the majority of their carbon footprint. 

While Europe is ahead in regulation, they are struggling with implementation. Last week’s news that the European Commission classified gas and nuclear power as green energy fractured key stakeholder groups.  This week, MorningStar reported that investors can change their classification under the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) without changing their investment strategy.  In essence, MorningStar found that SFDR is green-lighting greenwashing by allowing firms to consider their investments as green without any material change.

Condoning crimes against the climate

The powerful right-wing lobby group ALEC (The American Legislative Exchange Council) is behind a wave of new state legislation aimed at blocking boycotts of the oil industry. Since the beginning of the year, Republican controlled states have been introducing a version of a law drafted by ALEC called the Energy Discrimination Elimination Act—to shield big oil from share selloffs and other measures intended to protest the fossil fuel industry’s role in the climate crisis.

Here comes the cavalry

The US Army is joining the fight against climate change, releasing its first climate strategy this week. It includes a 50% emissions reduction target for 2030 and a 2050 net-zero commitment. They aim to reduce their emissions through energy savings, buying an electrified vehicle fleet, and purchasing energy from low carbon sources. The scale of this commitment is hard to overstate, in 2017 alone, the US Army’s emissions totaled 59 million tons, a level greater than several industrialized nations.

A breakthrough for clean energy

Developing means for carbon-neutral energy is essential in the race to net zero. A major breakthrough in nuclear fusion this week begs the question: will nuclear fusion energy be a part of the transition? The breakthrough only produced 11 megawatts of energy (enough to power about 60 tea kettles), yet is proof of concept for larger-scale projects. Ideally, nuclear fusion could provide unlimited supplies of low-carbon and low-radiation energy; but it will likely take until 2050 before it could be rolled out at scale. 

Other news you might have missed: 

As always, please like, share, and subscribe. 

Missed our previous edition of ESG & Climate News? Check it out now and stay in the know: January 28, 2022.

© 2022 Persefoni AI Inc. All rights reserved. This presentation is the exclusive property of Persefoni and may not be copied or distributed, in whole or in part, without the express permission of Persefoni.

Persefoni is the leading Climate Management & Accounting Platform (CMAP). The company’s Software-as-a-Service solutions enable enterprises and financial institutions to meet stakeholder and regulatory climate disclosure requirements with the highest degrees of trust, transparency, and ease. As the ERP of Carbon, the Persefoni platform provides users a single source of carbon truth across their organization, enabling them to manage their carbon transactions and inventory with the same rigor and confidence as their financial transactions.